More Bart Ehrman, Interrupted

I’ve been posting a bit about Bart Ehrman’s ridiculous book, Jesus, Interrupted, and linking to Ben Witherington‘s series (now up to part 4) examining Ehrman’s claims.  In post #4, BW writes,

The early church, as we begin to see already in Papias, was confident that their ultimate source documents went back to apostles, prophets, eyewitnesses and their co-workers, which is why these 27 documents are in the NT. They were composed by Paul (with help of scribes and co-workers), Peter (1 Peter with help of Silas probably), Mark, Luke (both co-workers of both Peter and Paul), the 4th Evangelist (drawing on Beloved Disciple written sources. The Beloved Disciple composed 1-3 John himself), the compiler of Matthew, James, Jude, perhaps Apollos in the case of Hebrews, John of Patmos, and at the very end of the NT period, the compiler of 2 Peter, drawing on Petrine and other materials.

In short, the NT can be traced back to about 8 people, either eyewitness apostles, or co-workers of such eyewitnesses and apostles. Early Christianity’s leaders were largely literate, and some of them, like Paul and the author of Hebrews, were first rate rhetoricians as well.

The post contains an immense amount of information on how to evaluate ancient literature, and specifically on the authorship and integrity of the New Testament documents.  I don’t know who needs this more, the atheists who are waving Ehrman’s book like a flag, or fundamentalists.

Every Christian should have some real understanding of where the Bible came from and why it’s believable; otherwise, fools like Ehrman come along with their incredibly bad scholarship, or claims about “other gospels,” throwing people to and fro.  The Bible is an extremely reliable set of ancient documents, supported by other documents. It doesn’t exist in a vacuum, as many people seem to think.  It didn’t just fall from the sky, and it wasn’t handed over to Joseph Smith to read with magic glasses.

One book I really want to read – when I have time – is Jesus and the Eyewitnesses by Richard Bauckham (mentioned by BW in his post).  Another I am adding to my list is BW’s future book What’s In A Word, whenever that comes out.  These days it’s not enough to slap a bumper sticker on your car or wear a WWJD bracelet (not that it ever was), or live from emotional high to emotional high; Christians are faced with all kinds of ridiculous claims by people looking for reasons not to believe. We should all be ready with enough knowledge of the truth to call a fool a fool.

Posted in Faith, Science & Doubt, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Great Divorce

I think my favorite book of all time has to be C.S. Lewis’ The Great Divorce.  In fact, if there were ever another book to be considered inspired, I would have to give it my vote.  Lewis does a remarkable job of seeing into the hearts and minds of men, and I suspect all of us can see ourselves in one or more of the characters.

Tonight I had the pleasure of seeing Anthony Lawton bring Lewis’ fable to life in an 80-minute one-man dramatization.  Lawton did a marvelous job of condensing the story without losing its impact, and of playing all the characters.  You can go here to see a 9-minute video clip.  Tonite I was amazed not only by Lawton’s performance, but also – again – by the story itself.

The point Lewis is making in the story is that people who end up in hell would rather be there than in Heaven, and to force them to live in Heaven would be an act of cruelty.  As Lewis develops his characters, you can see that this in fact would be the case.  At the very least, people who end up in hell do so by choice.

I subscribe to a number of atheist blogs, because I’m interested in seeing if anyone has come up with a reasonable reason for not believing in God. So far, even from those who claim to be quite rational and logical, I’ve yet to find one. In fact, I keep coming back to Lewis’ thinking in The Great Divorce.  Atheism is essentially a moral choice, not intellectual.  I am surprised, actually, at how many times immorality plays in to people’s loss of faith (even though they deny it).  For example, it seems that many people just don’t want to be told they require forgiveness.

I was wondering if reading The Great Divorce would have an impact on peoples’ atheism, but I honestly think that most would simply respond as one of the characters in the book.  I could be wrong, and hope that I am.

Posted in Faith, Science & Doubt, Reviews, Theological Musings | Leave a comment

Various views on liturgy

Just in time to fit in to my series on Liturgy, here’s an interesting collection of thoughts on the importance of liturgical worship.

Posted in Church, The Liturgy | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

As I was saying…

Bart Ehrman is certainly getting his 15 minutes of fame; or at least infamy:

The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Bart Ehrman
colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor NASA Name Contest

In my opinion, Bart Ehrman qualifies as a fool.   I haven’t read his book yet, but everything I hear from him is nonsense.   There’s so much good scholarship out there… he apparently avoided all of it- quite a task.

In that regard, Michael Patton offers a look at how the Apostles were martyred as supporting evidence to the truth of the Resurrection.

Posted in Theological Musings | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments