I ran across an interesting post this morning that discusses Eugene V. Koonin’s recent article in Biology Direct entitled, “The cosmological model of eternal inflation and the transition from chance to biological evolution in the history of life.” (Catchy title…)
Rather than trying to figure out how RNA came to exist by our universe’s rules, he proposes a different set of rules, under a multiverse theory. It’s all rather interesting. More interesting, however, is the following quote from the post:
…last year Nature recognized that the multiverse hypothesis is unfalsifiable and “isn’t science.” Nature then affirmatively quoted anti-ID physicist Leonard Susskind stating, “It would be very foolish to throw away the right answer on the basis that it doesnÂ’’t conform to some criteria for what is or isn’t science.”
Well, okay then…