The Sins of Self-Promotion

    “Beware of practicing your righteousness before other people in order to be seen by them, for then you will have no reward from your Father who is in heaven.
“Thus, when you give to the needy, sound no trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may be praised by others. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you.   (Matthew 6:1-4 ESV)

One of the more disheartening things about Facebook, twitter, and the so-called “blogosphere,” is the realization that so much about contemporary evangelicalism is focused on marketing and self-promotion.  As a child, perhaps the most important thing I learned (aside from the incredible truth that “Jesus loves me, this I know”)  was that the Christian life was a life of humility. So much of Jesus’ teachings emphasized this point:

  • Take the lowest seat at the table.
  • Whoever leads must serve.
  • The last will be first, and the first will be last.
  • Pray in your closet, not in public.
  • Do your good deeds in secret.
  • If you do things to be noticed, you’ve received your reward.

All very unpopular teachings today.

 It’s a marketing world

The contemporary evangelical church (I’ll define “evangelical” in an upcoming post, as it really doesn’t mean what they think it means) has adapted to the contemporary culture, which is at its core a marketing culture. Everything in our culture is marketed, from products and services to politics, religion, education and truth. The new word on the street is “branding,” meaning to establish yourself as unique and identifiable. You’ve got to brand yourself because everyone is selling something, even if it’s just themselves. Everyone—whether a business, a personality, or a teenager—needs a facebook page, a blog, and a twitter account to establish yourself and claim your territory.  If you don’t have followers, you are a non-entity. I have fans, therefore I am.

A corresponding assumption in a marketing world is that there are scarce resources, both in what is being marketed as well as the audience being marketed to, giving rise to competition. Those doing the marketing present themselves as offering something that is special and scarce (more scarce than the market), something that you can’t get around the corner or get on your own. The concept is, “We have the best teaching, the best worship, the best pastors, the best Sunday School, and you need us in order to be special.”  Then there are those who offer something new, unique, and out of the ordinary, perhaps a visitation from God or an experience that no one else can offer.  Para-church ministries also market themselves as being special or doing special things that no one else will or can do, so you must support them as opposed to the ministry next door. Often the people who are the focus of the ministry are held out as quasi-hostages with the thought, “if you don’t support my ministry, these people will die or perhaps even go to hell.” Marketing is all about being special, because no one merely wants to be normal or ordinary.

The 2nd part of that assumption is that the market itself is scarce. At the essence of marketing is competition for a target market, because there aren’t enough followers/customers to go around. There are only so many “targets” out there, who have only so much money to contribute. Therefore, the competition’s on to get church members as well as contributor dollars (a church full of needy people can’t support a pastor).  Churches need to convince members to give 1st to the local church, then the crumbs can go to missions, etc. Para-church organizations, then, are left vying for the crumbs. This “scarcity” mentality, obviously, is not consistent with a belief in a God who provides, who owns “the cattle on a thousand hills” (Psalm 50). Furthermore, this thinking attempts to relocate the “faith burden” from the church/ministry leaders onto the members/contributors, who are told to trust God and give as a sign of that trust. The concept of scarcity is essentially anti-faith.

It’s all about me

Because I think about a lot of things and enjoy writing about them, I write this blog, as well as one business-related blog (which I have more or less suspended), and one related to my book (which is, yes, an attempt at cheap marketing). Because I blog, I have read a lot of articles on “how to blog,” etc.  All such articles focus on how to be special, and how to keep readers coming back and remaining involved. The same kind of thinking appears in any article about being involved in social media. Again, it’s all about branding (establishing yourself as “special”).  I tend to break all of those rules (because I’m simply not good enough to keep them), so I’ll never become rich by selling ad space or selling millions of copies of my book.

The more I read about what I should be doing in order to grow my blog and develop my personal brand, I began to see a trend: most of the folks writing this stuff are mainly writing to promote themselves. They really have nothing new to offer, and so far no one has been able to tell me exactly why I need to “tweet” in the first place. Twitter is mainly about self-promotion, and so is LinkedIn.  Twitter does not exist for you, it exists for Twitter. Every week I get emails from Twitter telling me I haven’t tweeted lately, or here’s someone new I should follow.  Seriously, why should they care?  Besides, most of what is being tweeted is not geared toward helping you, the reader.  It’s all self-promotion, about not forgetting that the tweeter still exists.

And as a target/consumer, I find myself thinking, why should I help you? Why should invest my time to read your crap?  If you’re really going to share something with me, fine. But don’t waste my time with self-promotion.

“Christian” self-promotion

One of the most famous moments of Christian self-promotion is told in Mark:

    And James and John, the sons of Zebedee, came up to him and said to him, “Teacher, we want you to do for us whatever we ask of you.” And he said to them, “What do you want me to do for you?” And they said to him, “Grant us to sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your glory.” Jesus said to them, “You do not know what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I drink, or to be baptized with the baptism with which I am baptized?” And they said to him, “We are able.” And Jesus said to them, “The cup that I drink you will drink, and with the baptism with which I am baptized, you will be baptized, but to sit at my right hand or at my left is not mine to grant, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared.” And when the ten heard it, they began to be indignant at James and John. And Jesus called them to him and said to them, “You know that those who are considered rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones exercise authority over them. But it shall not be so among you. But whoever would be great among you must be your servant, and whoever would be first among you must be slave of all. For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”
(Mark 10:35-45 ESV)

The story is also told in Matthew 20, but with Mrs. Zebedee leading the way.  Either way, the boys were participating in this attempt at self-promotion, and the other 10 disciples were “indignant.”  My guess is that they were upset they hadn’t asked first.  Here is perhaps the first instance of Christian self-promotion, asking Jesus to be great in the Kingdom. Jesus’ comments are quite direct, yet still, how many of us still ask Jesus to be promoted, to the exclusion of others?  I have to give them credit for one thing, however: Rather than trying to pass themselves off as something special, they were at least honest about their desire, and went straight to Jesus with their request. For many of us (I include myself, not being immune to temptation), this would be a positive step.

 The “Self” in self-promotion

It doesn’t take a genius to see that the focus in self-promotion is “self.” That’s the point. It’s about promoting my church, my ministry, my needs, me.

What’s wrong with this picture?

From a marketing standpoint, nothing. From a Christian standpoint (“Christian” meaning that which is a Biblical, New Testament teaching), there’s not much right about it. Consider Paul’s comments to the Philippians:

    Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves. Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others. Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.    (Philippians 2:3-8 ESV)

But how can you become an in-demand conference speaker if you don’t promote yourself?  How can you become a worship star, or have a successful TV ministry? How can you attract thousands of people to your church, or become a best-selling author?

How, indeed.

Is all self-promotion bad?

By now, you’re probably asking, “Is all self-promotion bad?”  The answer, of course, is “no.” For example, I follow several folk musicians on Facebook just so they can tell me when they have new music coming out or when they may be playing near me. If they didn’t tell me, I wouldn’t know. I also “like” a few Christian ministries because I like and care about what they are doing. Their “promotion” is focused on what they like to give away, not to build themselves up. Generally speaking, this type of self-promotion is done from a place of humility; as such, these folks present themselves, rather than attempt to raise themselves up.  In a world dominated by self-aggrandizing, it’s often humility that stands out.

Sometimes I think I’m not as successful as I could be because I am really bad at self-promotion. While a part of me would really like to be well-known and respected, I believe this is contrary to the ideal life of the Christian as taught in the New Testament, as well as contrary to my personality.Whenever I’ve tried self-promotion, I think I come across as a jerk. So for me, humility is not so much spiritual as it is safe.

It’s quite easy to adopt the marketing mentality of the culture and want to start competing for market share and notoriety. It’s natural to want to see your name in lights or your picture on the cover of Rolling Stone (to quote an old song).

It’s something else entirely to occupy the lowest seat and be asked by your host to move up to a place of higher honor.

 Seek Ye First

Matthew chapter 6 is a killer chapter. In a good way, that is. It starts out with Jesus saying, “Beware of practicing your righteousness before other people…” He teaches the Lord’s Prayer, talks about laying up treasure in Heaven, he considers the lilies of the field, and in v. 33 says, “But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.”  When I was a teenager, this was one verse that we all knew, and we sang that little chorus over, and over, and over…  But we knew that verse.

It seems to me (and I’m talking to myself here) that if we took this seriously, we could avoid all of that striving and self-aggrandizing self-promotion. Maybe we’re so preoccupied with trying to figure out complicated theologies and business plans that we have forgotten to simply believe the simple truths.

We need to forget about seeking followers and fans, and just focus on learning how to be followers ourselves. And no, I’m not going to tweet that. #notweets

 

 

 

Posted in Church, Random Thoughts | Leave a comment

The Law – Defining Terms

I had an interesting revelation about the law a couple of weeks ago. It turns out that there are some people have some very, very different definitions for the Biblical word “law.”

In The Gospel Uncensored, I tried hard to distinguish between various uses of the word, using a capital “L” to refer to the Law of Moses, as opposed to more generic uses of the word. But, I assumed that everyone thought of “law” as something that is required of you, and for which there would be some sort of penalty for breaking.

It’s more of a guideline…

For example, traffic laws are not suggestions, or recommendations, they are rules with accompanying penalties for breaking them (and getting caught).  That’s why they are called laws.  However, there are some traffic signs which do contain warnings or suggestions, such as those warning of dangerous conditions.  It’s good to follow these recommendations, however there are no penalties for not following them (unless you have an accident, etc.).   The difference between laws and non-laws has been well-illustrated in the Disney “Pirates of the Caribbean” movies with the phrase, “It’s more of a guideline than an actual rule” (which, by the way, first appeared in “Ghostbusters,” but that’s beside the point).  There are laws/rules that must be followed or else, and there are suggestions or guidelines, that may determine our success or failure, but for which there are no legal consequences.

The Bible contains both.  There are lots of laws, and also a lot of what could be called guidelines.  These guidelines include warnings about harmful behavior (which happens to include trying to become righteous through following laws) and “how shall we then live” exhortations.

The problem is, many people can’t seem to tell the difference.

The worst definition of law I have ever heard

A couple of weeks ago someone posted a short interview by a very well-known pastor that contained what is undoubtedly the worst definition of law I have ever heard.  The only good thing about it was that he defined his term, which exposed the bad theology he was presenting. His definition was something like (from memory), “The Law is God’s statements about everything that is good.”

What?  With a definition like that, your teaching on the compatibility of “Law and Gospel” is pretty easy. The problem is, your theology sucketh.

There are a number of folks out there that are overly committed to various Reformation concepts like “Law and Gospel” that no one really understands. So, theological discussions end up quoting certain Lutheran or Reformed theologians rather than just dealing with what the Bible actually says, which is a great way to avoid dealing with Scripture if people aren’t paying attention.  To be honest, while I consider Martin Luther to be one of my heroes of the faith, he is not my source of theological authority. I believe he was wrong about a lot of things, and that subsequent Lutheran theologians were also, perhaps even more so, wrong about many things. Quoting folks is fine, I do it myself. However, I don’t base any conclusions on the Formula of Concord, which is a theological position, not Scripture. (And don’t even mention Calvin…)

Good Advice?

If we accept my definition of “law” to mean a commandment with legal consequences, such as the Law of Moses, then we can draw a distinction between that and other exhortations, which may also have consequences.  Saying “jump off that cliff and you’ll fall to your death” is not a law in that sense.  You wouldn’t get fined or sent to prison for jumping off the cliff; you’d merely die, not as punishment, but as a natural consequence to your choices. “Stop sinning or something worse will befall you” is also not the pronouncement of a law, but a warning about the consequences of choices.  When Paul says, “Walk redeeming the time,” is he pronouncing a new law? Of course not.  To confuse the two is to read the New Testament without any sort of context whatsoever.

So, perhaps besides distinguishing between “Law” and “Gospel,” we should add a 3rd category, for “good advice.” While you might react to the idea that some of what Paul or Jesus said may be considered “good advice,” just think about it.  There’s nothing unholy about good advice. The Golden Rule, “do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” is absolutely excellent advice.  Paul gave some great advice in Philippians 4:8, “Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.”  Is this good?  Is it a law? What if we forget to think about something commendable?

Perhaps there’s a better term for it—wisdom, perhaps—but “good advice” seems functional. That doesn’t mean it’s not inspired or true, just that it is what it is.

Bad teaching

Unfortunately there is a lot of really bad teaching out there, and people have been conditioned not to question it.  This past week I listened to part of a radio-broadcast sermon on my way to church that was possibly the worst (next to Robert Tilton) teaching I’ve every heard on tithing. The pastor actually claimed that his particular church would be punished by God if the congregation failed to give appropriately. Think about it…

But, there are a lot of well-meaning pastors who link everything—righteousness, holiness, salvation, you name it—to certain cherry-picked behaviors. Tithing is a popular one, of course, for obvious reasons.  Divorce used to be a popular one, but as so many pastors and leaders have now been divorced, it’s no longer in favor, in spite of the fact that it is one of the few “commandments” that Paul declares is not from him, but from the Lord:  “To the married I give this charge (not I, but the Lord): the wife should not separate from her husband. (1 Corinthians 7:10)” Here we have more than just good advice, we have an actual commandment, and it’s almost universally ignored in the contemporary church. Do we have any explanation for this, other than Jesus’ “Because of your hardness of heart…” (Matt. 19:8)?

And then, there’s the little matter of women speaking in church (1 Cor. 14)…

Legalism rules

For whatever reason, many people love laws, and can’t deal with the concept that Paul encouraged us to make decisions about some things “according to our faith.”  They also have a hard time dealing with the thought that we might called to do “good works” because they are good, and for no other reason. So, the natural result is to take random things from the Bible and make them into laws, and ignore the others.

Living the Christian life and doing Good Works is not like selling magazine subscriptions; you’ll never build up enough points to earn that crown. You do good works because you are being changed from glory to glory, and the more you are being transformed, the more you want to do good works.  Reading the Bible is a good thing to do because… it’s a good thing to do.  You should not jump off that cliff because, you’d die.  Don’t sin because sin can kill and enslave you; it’s bad.

It all seems so simple, doesn’t it?  Do good things because they are good, and don’t to bad things because they are bad.  Do you really need any other reasons?

Avoid confusion

Don’t confuse Law—that which was given to to Moses to guard the Israelites for a time—with the Gospel.  No righteousness ever came through the Law, which actually increased sin rather than increasing righteousness. And, don’t confuse wisdom (aka “good advice”) with the Law, either.  Paul told us in more than one way that the Law is now (and for Gentiles, always was) inapplicable. The “old man” died under the Law, the “new man” lives free from the Law.  The Law has been “set aside,” having been nailed to the cross.

One of the biggest areas of confusion regarding the issue of grace is the belief that a reliance on grace and teaching that the Law is inapplicable stems from the fear that this somehow is akin to licentiousness; that we actually will “sin more, that grace may abound.”  That, of course, is quite ridiculous.  There is no such possibility as being “free to sin,” as we know that sin is by nature bondage. We are no longer in bondage to sin, but also no longer in bondage to the law. As Paul said, “It is for freedom that Christ has set us free.”

Freedom determines a life lived in pursuit of good works, because that’s just how it is. Anything less is not freedom.

Grace, and peace.

Posted in New Covenant Law | Leave a comment

The Blu-Ray Rant

bluray

I’m taking a little break from writing about anything of lasting consequence to complain about something totally meaningless.

I’m not complaining about Blu-ray movies; in fact, I love Blu-ray, most of the time. I do think that a little work to standardize some features would be nice, but in general Blu-ray is improving. What I feel the need to complain about is how many of my favorite movies have not been released on Blu-ray. It’s frustrating, especially when you see the kind of crap that they do release on Blu-ray.  Take a look at the cheap movie bin at Walmart or Fred Meyer and I assure you you’ll pick up any number of titles and think, “They released that?”

Which makes the fact that there are so many really good movies that haven’t yet been released.  Here are a few of my all-time favorites, which so far are only available on DVD:

  1. The Village.  So the critics hated it.  I believe it’s the only Shyamalan film not on Blu-ray; Unbreakable is available, and many people have never heard of it. Great performances by Sigourney Weaver, William Hurt, Joaquin Phoenix, and Bryce Dallas Howard is awesome in this film. And, there’s a great use of color. It really needs a good Blu-ray transfer.
  2. George of the Jungle.  Seriously, this is a travesty. This has been a favorite of mine since the 90’s. My kids actually begged me to stop renting it.  And to make matters worse, it’s not even available on DVD widescreen!  I don’t get it. No one appreciates art.
  3. Muppet Treasure Island.  Muppets, a classic story, great scenery, awesome music, and Tim Curry. What more could you want on Blu-ray?
  4. Foul Play.  I love this movie. It’s  Chevy Chase’s 1st movie role, and one of the great spy/assassination spoofs of all time. And, it stars Goldie Hawn and features one of the all-time great theme songs (“Ready to Take a Chance Again”) sung by Barry Manilow. “Beware the Dwarf.”
  5. Country Bears. What’s with Disney, anyway?  Christopher Walken rocks in this movie. And the cameos by Don Henley, Bonnie Raitt and Elton John are great.
  6. Help!  No, it’s not the masterpiece that A Hard Day’s Night is, but it’s hilarious in its own right and has some of the best of the Beatles’ music.
  7. Songcatcher.  Great music and scenery; featuring Iris Dement, Taj Mahal, and Emmy Rossum singing like a hillbilly.
  8. Down From The Mountain. This is a concert video / documentary featuring the artists and music from Oh Brother, Where Art Thou?, hosted by John Hartford. Why Blu-ray, do you ask?  Why not?
  9. Song Of The South. This, of course, is the Disney movie they are scared to release again. To my knowledge it’s never been on DVD, but was released for a short time on VHS.  It’s a cool movie that was actually anti-racist when it came out. Great effects for its time, combining live action and animation.
  10. Troll.  Camp to the extreme, featuring a nearly all-star cast, including Michael Moriarty, Julia-Louise Dreyfus, Sonny Bono, Brad Hall, and June Lockhart. They have released Troll 2 on Blu-ray (considered one of the worst movies ever made), so why not the original?

Okay, this is my top-10 Blu-ray want list. Feel free to add your own in the comments.

Posted in Random Thoughts | Leave a comment

Why I Don’t Do Well in Church

 

I have recently concluded that I just don’t do well in church—”church” meaning the standard, evangelical Sunday morning gathering where “worship” means singing songs and serves as a warm-up to the main act, the Sermon.

At this point in my life, I find that I go to church for 2 main reasons. One is to refocus and connect to God. The 2nd reason is social, to connect with people.  I never go to church looking forward to a 1/2 hour of overly loud rock & roll worship choruses or a 45 minute sermon. Never, unless there’s a specific guest speaker.

There are a number of reasons why I don’t do well in many contemporary churches, including that it seems they don’t really have a grasp on why it is they are meeting on Sunday mornings in the first place. It’s rare to find a church with a true sense of purpose. Often, it seems that they meet because it’s Sunday morning, and that’s when churches meet.  This kind of circular reasoning becomes quite evident after a very short time as the focus becomes just keeping the wheel turning. And, if they can’t demonstrate a clear sense of purpose for being there, what’s my purpose for being there?

Another reason why I don’t do well in some of these churches the fact that the sermon has become the focus, and pastors think they need to talk for a half hour or (usually) longer whether they have anything to say or not.  The truth is, I’ve heard many, many sermons in my lifetime, but relatively few that justified 30-45 minutes of my time. Even the best teachers/speakers can have a few stellar sermons, but I’ve never known anyone who can pull off a decent sermon every single Sunday morning.

How Sermons Became Center

A friend of mine recently directed me to a post by Robin Phillips which does a great job of summarizing the shift from the early Eucharist-based worship to a cognitive-focused approach to church. He writes,

What changed in the centuries following the reformation was more a question of what is the center of worship? If our implicit operating assumption is that we are primarily defined by what we think, then we will view church as first and foremost a vehicle for preaching the Word, for giving doctrinal instruction and for equipping the saints for another week of thinking correct thoughts. This is in contrast to a more sacramental and liturgical view of worship (and indeed, of life) which recognizes that love for Christ must be cultivated not primary through hearing correct doctrine, important as that is, but through the embodied practices of communal ritual, through material practices that educate our desires and, in so doing, shape our identity in ways that are often pre-cognitive.

Phillips points out that initially the shift to the sermon-centered service corresponded with a shift towards rationalism and a belief in the mind’s ability to know and understand truth.

When the Rationalism Fades

What I find really interesting is that within contemporary evangelicalism there is a movement away from intellectualism, which is evident in the shift from theologically-based hymns to more emotionally based worship choruses. In many churches, the worship “set” is actually geared toward turning off the mind and focusing on feelings.  So, we have a Sunday morning format which is designed to facilitate a rationalist approach to Christianity, but a Christianity which has moved away from a rationalist approach to a more emotional (“spiritual”) approach.

What we are left with is a very big, empty structure that people are trying to fill with singing and talking, often with a lack of clear focus and purpose. This would probably explain why many (probably most) contemporary sermons fall into the categories of self-help, exhortation (scolding), practical application (more things to do), and the pastor’s perspective on life.

Which all helps explain one reason why I don’t do well in those churches.

 

 

Posted in Church | Leave a comment