African Rhythms

One of the first things I think about when I think of Africa is the rhythms – the drums, the dancing, and all that other National Geographic stuff. I was not disappointed by my visit to Ghana – although what I heard, as far as worship music goes, was not necessarily what I expected, not that I had any specific expectations. I am sure there are more varied styles than what I heard, but my visit was limited to a few places in Tema, and one church in the Central (coastal) Region.

Gospel SingersOne of the first things that struck me was the obvious impact of Western Gospel music. The first church we visited had a gospel choir, backed up by what was – from my brief experience – a pretty standard worship band setup, consisting of a drum kit, congas, a portable electric keyboard and bass guitar, all playing at a pretty high volume. The music was a melding of Gospel, jazz & funk, played over African rhythms, and was all pretty up-tempo. In fact, even their slow songs were up-tempo, and they often wouldn’t stop to change songs, they’d just go from one to the other. They wouldn’t even stop to change drummers – something I had not seen before, but saw a couple of times in Ghana. I don’t know who would initiate the change, but on 2 or 3 occasions I would see a guy walk up to the drummer in mid-song. Without losing a beat, the drummer would stand and pass off the sticks to the new guy.

The Shuffle - photo by Fred AllenAnother feature of their worship was the dancing; the women all did the same little shuffle – very low key, but still very much into the beat. They’d do their little shuffle back and forth, then occasionally start doing a “conga line,” weaving up and down the aisles. The men, at least in a church setting, tended to be less demonstrative.

At the YWAM base, worship was a tad more Western. I recognized several Vineyard and other songs I knew, and was surprised to even hear a couple of songs that had been written by people I knew. Now, that makes it seem like a small world. However, even though they were songs that I knew, they were all done with an African rhythm, which was really great to hear. I wished that I could have brought some of the rhythms home with me (I do have some video clips) but they’re a bit more complicated than a standard 4/4 Vineyard beat, and beyond my djembe abilities. One of the YWAM students was one of the best bass players I think I’ve heard – he would do some funk riffs that were just amazing.

At the YWAM base, the guys were not at all hesitant to join in the dancing, and also showed far less restraint than the women. Actually, it didn’t take much for the guys to break into a dance – just a simple rhythm on a djembe, and they’d be in a circle having a blast. Now, I’ve seen guys dance over here, but nothing like this.

Often, worship at YWAM would be led by Diana Akiwumi, who it turns out, is one of Ghana’s more well-known Gospel singers. I recently found an article about her in one of the on-line Ghana newspapers.

As I mentioned in a prior post, we spent 4 nights in an inner-city mission church, where English was more of a second language. Worship here was also a bit less Western, although they had the same basic worship band setup. The music, however, had a different feel – it’s hard to explain, but it had kind of a ska feel, only at a much faster tempo than I’m used to. The women here did the same little shuffle dance that we saw in the first church.

Mission church worship bandOh, it was also all very loud. Apparently it’s better if it’s loud – even if it distorts. And, as it turns out, the guests are usually placed right in front of one of the speakers, I suppose to make sure we can really get the full effect. It was sometimes a bit hard to take. Another surprising thing was that everyone seemed to have an ample supply of wireless microphones. Having batteries die and swapping mics was not an unusual occurrence.

We also spent a couple of days in the Central Region, at a little leadership conference. The conference was being held at a borrowed church, without the benefit of a sound system, or worship band. Worship here was done in what appeared to be a common style to those in attendance, representating several different churches. Worship was sung in something other than English, in kind of a singing chant, with no real rhythm that I could discern. While I didn’t understand what they were singing, I did appreciate the spirit of worship that existed, as well as just being able to experience some other form of worship than that which we saw in Tema.

As you might expect, returning to the States and my home church was a kind of reverse culture-shock. It struck me how self-conscious the worship band was, working so hard to achieve some kind of “smooth” presentation. At the same time, the whole worship experience seemed, for lack of a better word, constipated. This is not to say that worship in Ghana does not have an element of self-consciousness, because it does – it’s just in a completely different way, that I could deal with because it was new. However, I am still having a very hard time with our church’s self-conscious worship, to the point where I have a hard time sitting through it – I just can’t seem to get past the worship band. Maybe I’ll just have to spend more time watching my videos of Ghana.

Posted in The Ghana Experience | 3 Comments

The Dumbing Down of the Church

I ran across a great article the other day by William Willimon on the CT site, titled This Culture is Overrated. The article isn’t so much about our culture as it is about the shortcomings of today’s preaching, as it tries to be “relevant” to contemporary culture. Actually, he is dealing with the “modern” culture, but the point made could also apply to any of the current post-modernish sub-cultures. A quote:

But this way of preaching fails to do justice to the rather imperialistic claims of Scripture. The Bible doesn’t want to speak to the modern world; the Bible wants to convert the modern world.

He also addresses one of my pet peeves – the dumbing down of the church, sermons in particular. Willimon says, “There is no way I can crank the gospel down to the level where any American can walk in off the street and know what it is all about within fifteen minutes. ” However, that’s what most pastors that I hear try to do. Needless to say, most of us who have been Christians for more than 15 minutes are bored senseless, and the man off the street sees Christianity as a kindergarten-like religion. Bottom line, if a pastor expects me to sit and listen to him for 45 minutes, he’d better have something to say.

Now, on listening to sermons: I’ve been going to church my whole life, I can read, and I can study the Bible. I really don’t need a sermon, and according to the Apostle Paul, “mature” Christians shouldn’t expect to be spoon-fed, yet we’ve been conditioned to think that it’s “our job.” That’s the only reason that I can think of why people keep coming back… they must think they have to, in order to be a Christian. Don’t people read the Bible?

Concerning any contemporary culture, Willimon is right: it’s temporal. Culture has a fairly short shelf-life, especially today. The Gospel, however, is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow. So, let’s get back to preaching it.

Posted in Random Thoughts | Leave a comment

Doesn’t Anyone Study the Bible Anymore?

Last week I went to two different Christian bookstores to look for a commentary on the Gospel of John. I already have more study Bibles, commentaries and systematic theologies than I know what to do with, but I’ve never used a book-specific commentary. So, I went to one small, dying, independent store, and one large chain store.

I was shocked at what I found. You might already know what I am going to say and think, “so?” But, I don’t go into Christian bookstores that much anymore so I had forgotten the state of Christian publishing – or, should I say, Christian marketing. Or, perhaps what I saw really indicated the state of Christian reading.

First, the largest book section of both stores was “Christian Fiction.” Now, I’ve read some Christian fiction, but not much. Most of it I avoid like the plague, because, basically, it’s just plain bad. What I really hate is when they have to stick in some odd, unnatural reference to God to qualify it as “Christian.” I’m sorry, but if you can’t even make Christianity sound normal, there’s a problem somewhere. I mean, if Grisham can do it, these other people should be able to.

There were also large sections of self-help books, categorized under “Christian Living,” “Men’s Issues,” and so on. There are Christian Diet books, Christian Finance books, and all kinds of other books I wouldn’t buy. The best books are always found in the “Pastors’ Helps” and “Theology” sections, if you can find them. Both stores had large selections of Bibles, in all shapes, sizes, and of course, themes (why is a Men’s Bible different from a Women’s Bible?), as well a plethora of Bible covers (including the must-have Purpose-Driven Life Bible cover), Bible bookmarks and other Bible paraphernalia.

I did actually find the commentaries in both stores after wandering around a bit – in one store I wandered a lot, because I kept thinking that they just had to have more Bible study materials somewhere (I was wrong…). I did find some of what were called Bible Studies, which were really poorly done fill-in-the-blank books, obviously meant to let people believe that they were actually studying the Bible. There were also dozens of topical Bible Studies. These do not actually study the Bible – they study topics, like “forgiveness” and “kindness,” and use Bible references to make their point. That’s not my definition of a Bible Study; that’s a study using the Bible as a reference. In my mind, there’s a difference.

Both stores did carry one or two of the same one-volume commentaries that I already owned, and a couple of book-specific commentary series. However, they were quite incomplete, with, sadly to say, no “John’s.” I stood there, looking at the poorly stocked shelves – in this section, the books were all spread out to make it seem like they actually had a lot to choose from – and wondered, “doesn’t anyone actually study the Bible anymore?”

I didn’t really think I needed another commentary on John anyway, so I wasn’t that disappointed from that standpoint. I was, however, just disappointed in what I found on the shelves.

But, it wasn’t a total loss, as I bought the latest Frank Peretti novel at a good discount. It’s not that bad…

Posted in Church | Leave a comment

Separation Anxiety

A look at the mythological
Constitutional Separation of Church and State

I use the word “mythological” to refer to the phrase “Constitutional Separation of Church and State,” because over the years it has taken on mythical dimensions, representing often vague ideologies based on half-truths, rumors and ignorance. It is bandied about as if it was the very foundation of the United States, by those who know – or should know – better. However, many Americans are unaware of the true origins and history of “the Separation,” and this bugs me enough that I am writing about it. My pain is your gain, so to speak.

First, everyone should know that the phrase, “Separation of Church and State” does not appear in the First Amendment to the Constitution, or anywhere else in the Constitution, for that matter. The good old First Amendment says:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.“

The first 10 words, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,” is what’s known as the “Establishment Clause.” The following phrase, “or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;” is the “Free Exercise” clause. Note that this applies only to laws passed by Congress. It doesn’t apply to having the 10 Commandments posted in a courtroom, or to a cross on a city-owned memorial in San Diego. It doesn’t apply to school prayer, or teaching Intelligent Design as one theory of origins. It doesn’t mean that Congress itself can’t open in prayer – it just can’t make any laws that either establishes, or limits, religion.

Now, in 1868, the 14th Amendment was added. While essentially dealing with “equal rights” (it’s a post-Civil War amendment), it also included what is now known as the Incorporation Doctrine:

“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; …”

So, what this essentially says is that no state can limit rights granted by the U.S. Constitution (only the courts, apparently, can do this). Again, nothing about offering prayers, displaying religious symbols, or anything of that nature. (It did, however, change the entire dynamic of the United States, giving the Federal Government, including the Supreme Court, way more power than I believe the original framers intended. This possibly was the first big move away from Original Intent, and has been the basis for many decisions resulting in a steady loss of states’ rights.)

Down the Slippery Slope

The phrase “separation between church and state” was first used by Thomas Jefferson in a letter to the Danbury Baptist Assoc., in which he so characterized the effect of the First Amendment. The Baptists feared the establishment of a National Church (and of course, feared it would not be Baptist). It is interesting to note that at the time, there were States who recognized official State churches, and Jefferson didn’t address that. Of course, this was back during the time when States actually had rights, before the 14th Amendment.

In 1947, nearly 150 years later, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black quoted Jefferson in his opinion on Everson v Board of Education, in which he graced us with his own interpretation of the 1st Amendment. The Supreme Court, since that time, has continued to build upon arguably defective reasoning to the point that the “wall of separation” has indeed grown to mythical proportions. More recently, Justice Souter opined that “government should not prefer one religion to another, or religion to irreligion,” a very questionable interpretation of the original intent.

There is a concept in common law (not, mind you, civil law) known as stare decisis, “to stand by things decided.” Essentially this means that prior decisions, known as “case law,” becomes the new foundation upon which all new decisions are based, essentially supplanting the Constitution. Stare decisis is, then, in tension with the concepts that the S.C. has the power to interpret the Constitution, and the Congress has the power to legislate. Since the Warren Court, stare decisis has played a major role in the Supreme Court’s decision-making, leading to the accurate assessment that the Supreme Court now “legislates from the bench.” The S.C. has essentially left the original intent of the Constitution on the shelf, and has gone gleefully skiing down the slippery slope of bad case law.

Ay, there’s the rub. The mythical separation of church and state is not – in any of it’s current definitions – a concept which was in the minds of the framers of the Constitions and the Bill of Rights. Rather, it has been very recent Supreme Court justices who have abandoned any notion of original intent and have created this legal myth – which seems more closely in tune with Marxist thought than with our Founding Fathers – with which we now have to contend.

Posted in Politics/Current Events | 2 Comments