Freedom of Stupidity or When Freedoms Collide

If you haven’t heard about this, a female passenger flying from LAX to Portland on Tuesday was “excused” from the plane at a stop in Reno for wearing an obscene t-shirt. She is now claiming her 1st Amendment rights have been violated. The NY Times has quoted an ACLU lawyer as saying her t-shirt was protected under the Constitution. I’ll have to remember that the next time my wife wants to throw away one of my favorite old t-shirts.

When I first heard this story, I wondered why it was that the only time Oregon is ever in the news is when a wacko is involved? I was glad to find out that the woman was not an Oregonian – she is actually a Washington resident. Whew! At least we don’t have to claim her. (If you question my use of the word “wacko” here, just listen to an interview with Ms. Heasley…)

But, this is the deal: Is every stupid thing we say or do protected by the First Amendment? It would seem so.

Now, Oregon is a different story, as the Oregon Constitution states, “No law shall be passed restraining the free expression of opinion, or restricting the right to speak, write or print freely on any subject whatever.” Last week the OR Supreme Court extended that to include obscene acts, as long as they are “expressive. ” So, we have yet another Oregon “wacko” story. So far, this isn’t U.S Constitutional issue. However, Oregon’s physician-assisted suicide law is. But, let’s try to forget Oregon’s problems for the time being.

One of the problems with some libertarians and liberals (and, yes, even some conservatives) is that they tend to be myopic. Failing to look at an issue holistically, they see the issue in its isolated, out-of-context form, where it’s easier to take extremist, absolutist (and often absurdist) positions. Certainly, you can look at the issue of freedom, of which I am a very strong proponent, and take a position that your freedoms are absolute, and guaranteed by the Constitution (or even by God). You could – and you’d be wrong. But, under the Constitution, you do have an absolute right to be wrong.

This is one of the great things about America: you have the right to be completely and utterly wrong, and to be completely and utterly wrong as loud as you want to be. Unless…

Unless your rights collide with another individual’s rights. Oops…, didn’t think that far ahead. What happens when your inalienable rights cross paths with someone else’s conflicting inalienable rights? Who, then, has the right of way (get it? That was a pun.)

Somewhere along the way, we need to realize that our inherent, inalienable rights are not absolute. (By the way, the words “inherent” and “inalienable” are from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution, and these rights include, “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Someday I’ll write about how theologically ridiculous this is.)

The Bill of Rights does not talk about “inherent and inalienable” rights – it specifically grants rights on the Consitution’s own authority. Have you ever read the First Amendment? It’s really quite simple:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

So simple, and the cause of so much litigation. The concept of a Bill of Rights was in itself fairly controversial; if the founding fathers had ever imagined what people would do to it, I doubt it ever would have been ratified. Common sense (that is, the most basic, elementary thinking of which nearly everyone should be capable) should tell us that there are times when our rights have to give way to others’ rights.

Consider, for a moment, the free exercise of religion. If your religion involved human sacrifice, your rights are limited. You have freedom of speech, but try yelling, “bomb!” on an airplane. Your rights end at the point where they interfere with someone else’s rights. In this case, Southwest Airlines has rights, to, which include deplaning someone wearing an obscene shirt – it’s in their terms of service.

So, Ms. Heasley, just get over it.

Posted in Random Thoughts | 1 Comment

A Plea to the Republican Party

First, I want to make it clear that I am not a die-hard Republican. I try to avoid being categorized, but for the sake of summarizing my political worldview, I probably fall somewhere in the libertarian/conservative categories on most issues. So, in spite of my feelings that the current two-party system has become counter-productive, I tend to favor the GOP.

I disagree with conservatives who take a “head in the ground” approach (which I’m afraid to say, many do); that is to say, those who are conservative out of a fear of change. The “radical righters” are even worse – although I may share some of their opinions, they scare me. I disagree more with those liberals who tend to be so open minded that their critical thinking skills have been lost. I disagree alot with those liberals who actually know why they are liberal, as those folks are also quite scary. I refer to them as the Great Liberal Conspiracy. You know who you are.

Now, not that anyone of importance will read this post (my 11 readers are not political movers and shakers), but I just have a couple of things to say to the Republican party:

  1. You’re supposed to be the conservative party
  2. That means you’re supposed to belive in a small Federal Government
  3. That also means you believe in spending less

So, can you people take a couple of steps back, look at what you’ve been doing, and just knock it off??

That’s all I have to say about that.

Posted in Politics/Current Events | Leave a comment

First Impressions

Koontz Cover

My all-time favorite author has to be James Blaylock. However, as he hasn’t written a new novel in years, I had to find someone to fill the void, and so stumbled upon Dean Koontz. Although his work is somewhat inconsistent, and I don’t think any of his books would be in the running for “Great American Novel,” there are a few of his novels that have to rank among my list of favorites.

Having just finished one of Koontz’ earlier novels on a flight home from Chicago, with a few days of well-earned vacation ahead of me, I needed to find something new to read. So, I stopped at a Barnes & Noble and grabbed By the Light of the Moon, which, although first published in 2002, I hadn’t yet read. I think I am going to enjoy this one, if the first line is any indication.

I really appreciate good first lines. I have come up with several of my own – the problem is developing the rest of the story to go with it. My favorite original line is, “For once there was no rain in the city.” (I don’t really care if you agree, so don’t bother writing with your comments.)

The first line of this book is probably one of the best I have read, right up there with “Call me Ishmael,” “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times…,” and “Last night, I dreamt I went to Manderley again.

Without any further ado, here it is:

“Shortly before being knocked unconscious and bound to a chair, before being injected with an unknown substance against his will, and before discovering that the world was deeply mysterious in ways he’d never before imagined, Dylan O’Connor left his motel room and walked across the highway to a brightly lighted fast-food franchise to buy cheeseburgers, French fries, pocket pies with apple filing, and a vanilla milkshake.”

Okay, it doesn’t roll off the tongue quite as easily as “Call me Ishmael,” but personally, I love it. It’s all I needed to read to decide that this was the next novel to which I was willing to devote time.

So, why am I sitting here writing instead of reading? I have no clue….

Posted in Reviews | Leave a comment

Who’s Got Faith?

I went to church today as usual, and everything went pretty much as scheduled. After our typical time of worship through song, one of the church board guys stood up to take the offering and give the announcements. Often there is some little encouragement to give, but for some reason today’s really stood out to me.

For some reason he started talking about fear, and how financial pressures create fear when it comes to giving. We should have faith, however, and give in spite of our fear. I don’t recall exactly how he put it (I wish I could), but the three key words were giving, fear and faith, not necessarily in that order. About this time I was having flashbacks of bad TV preachers, and I thought, “Our faith, what about your faith? Why doesn’t the church leadership have faith, and stop making such a big show about the offerings? Why not just put a box on the back table and tell people to give if they feel led?”

That’s pretty radical, I know… but, I used to belong to a church that did just that, and everything worked out great. If the church leadership exhibited a bit more real faith, perhaps I’d start trusting them with some of my money. (Obviously at this point you’ve figured out that I don’t believe you have to tithe to your local church. For more on this, you can read my article on SmallVoices.)

We give to the church in other ways – my wife and I teach the Teen Sunday School class, which I love, and do other things as we feel led. We also give to groups and people, as we feel led.

The offering guy was, however, correct in that there is fear associated with giving, and that giving is an act of faith. That, however, does not presume that giving in fear on Sunday morning is necessarily the proper – or spiritual – thing to do.

Posted in Church | Leave a comment