Category Archives for Random Thoughts

Status update

This is just a short post to let my faithful readers know I haven’t lost interest in the blog or dropped off the face of the earth.   The last couple of weeks have been consumed with home improvement projects and Christmas. While I fully intended to post my next in the “Exploring the Twain” series during the holidays, I expect it will be a few days before that gets done.

Another excuse is that I was given G.K. Chesterton’s Orthodoxy for Christmas, and it has more or less preempted my other reading plans.  Why haven’t I read this book before?  Chesterton is amazing… my New Year’s resolution will probably be to read more of him.  So, don’t be surprised to see something Chesterton-inspired soon.

But, I promise – I’ll get back to my look at Eastern Orthodoxy and “the Twain.”

Historical evidence for the Bethlehem census story

Weekend Fisher writes today concerning some historical evidence for the story – often written off as mere myth – that Jesus was born in Bethlehem as a result of a census.   Apparently, as no Roman documents exist from that period, that there is no record of such a census.  However, some interesting documents exist from the 2nd and early 3rd centuries that refer to such tax/census documents.  He writes:

Justin Martyr, attempting to persuade the Roman government to stop persecuting Christians, refers the Romans to their own tax registers to verify Jesus’ birth. After mentioning the prophecy of the Messiah’s birth in Bethlehem he continues:

Now there is a village in the land of the Jews, thirty-five stadia from Jerusalem, in which Jesus Christ was born, as you can ascertain also from the registers of the taxing made under Cyrenius, your first procurator in Judæa.- Justin Martyr, First Apology XXXIV (circa 150-155 A.D.)

Tertullian makes a similar reference approx. 50 years later, indicating that Jesus’ birth was recorded in the documents kept in the archives in Rome, essentially challenging doubters to go look it up.

Of course, naysayers will respond that these 2 could simply have been bluffing, although I doubt they could provide any proof that either Tertullian or Justin Martyr had a tendency to make stuff up.  Historically, these references – if related to nearly any other issue – would be given serious consideration.

At this point, it would seem that there is no reason whatsoever to doubt this portion of the story.  And, this provides another example of why it is important to pay attention to the writings of the early church.

The Post Post

Today I was reading yet another blog post talking about post-evangelical Christianity, and I realized just how sick I am of things being “post.”    All the time I’m hearing post-Christian, post-evangelical, post-conservative, postmodern, post-American, postnasal – I mean, what’s up with that?  It’s ridiculous.  Seriously, why does everything have to be post-something-else?  Why can’t it simply be what it is?  It’s a pain in the posterior; it’s enough to make a person go postal.

“Post,” apparently, is the  préfixe du jour, which is kind of ironic when you think that it’s a prefix that means “comes after.”  But, that’s the wonder of the English language.  Words – especially stupid words – do seem to come in and out of vogue; someone will use an odd word, and all of a sudden everyone is using it.  Years ago, I remember such a word was “diametrically,”  as in “diametrically opposed.”  Like “post,” it’s a word that really didn’t have to be used. I mean, how opposed to something do you really have to be? But, for a few years it seemed that no one was merely opposed to something, everyone was “diametrically opposed.”  And, like “post,” it didn’t really say anything about what anyone was, just what they weren’t.

If something is “post,” then it’s over; it no longer exists, it’s dead. Or, worse than that, it’s postmortem, after dead.  Dead is what it is.  If you’re worried about after dead, then you’ve got problems; post-traumatic stress, perhaps.

Being post is a lot like being a-something, like asymmetric, or perhaps asymptomatic.  Or an atheist, which is also all the rage now.  One of the reasons, I think, that atheists have such a hard time organizing is that they aren’t necessarily for anything, and they don’t necessarily have any shared beliefs; what they have is a shared unbelief.  Which, I guess, is a lot like being post something. The posts also have a hard time organizing, because, let’s face it, they’re simply too late.  They’re not only not for something, they’ve missed it – the ship has already sailed.

Why aren’t there any pre-anythings?  Wouldn’t it better to be a little early, rather than being late, or simply being not?   I guess that’s what prophets are – those who are pre-something.  Prophets are good people to have around – even the name is positive: pro-phet.  We don’t seem to have any of those guys around anymore. But, that’s a subject for another post.

I’m tired of all the posts; in fact, I’m against them.  I guess you could say I’m apostalic, railing against the posts. So, don’t talk to me about postmodernism or postevangelicalism.  If you are too late to be something, I don’t want to hear about it.

Chase Bank apparently wants customers to leave

I had the funniest conversation this afternoon with a Customer Service Representative (defining the title broadly) of Chase concerning the newly increase interest rates on our Chase Mastercard.

I should back up a bit.  A few years ago we opened an account at Washington Mutual.  It was a nice little bank, conveniently located, and the employees were all very nice and helpful.  We were quite sad when they were gobbled up by JP Morgan Chase, an opinion that is shared universally among people with whom we have spoken.  In fact, I’ve not heard one nice thing about Chase, by anyone.  But, the bank was still local.

The first clue that we needed to leave was when my son, who also has an account there, went into the bank to inquire about something.  He was told, for some strange reason, not to come into the bank to ask questions again.  So much for nice and helpful.

Then, I read that while banks like Bank of America had decided not to increase their interest rates on credit cards, Chase was going ahead with their interest rate hikes before a new consumer protection bill takes effect in a few months.   Then, yesterday I read that JP Morgan Chase’s profits had exceeded expectations, almost six times its profits a year ago.  Six times!

So, I checked my most recent statement and sure enough, the rate had indeed increased… to 29.99%!  An increase to 19% I would not have been shocked at, but 30%?   When we took the card out about 4 years ago, the rate was under 10% – which was why we used it rather than our BofA card, which is still under 12%.  Fortunately, we keep our card paid down, so it’s not that big of a deal to us.  But, I decided to call Chase to discuss this out of principle (actually, out of interest, but you know what I mean).  I had already decided to bail on Chase, but I just wanted to hear what they had to say.

The phone call went something very similar to this (I actually wished I had recorded it, but it’s as verbatim as I can recall):

Me:  I would like to confirm the interest rate on my Mastercard.  Can it be true that it has been rased to 29.99%?

Chase (a male with an Indian-sounding accent):  Thank you for calling about Chase’s interest rates.  Let me check your account …   Yes, that is the new rate.

Me:  How can this be?  Isn’t this kind of insane?

Chase:  Thank you for calling about interest rates.  Chase made the decision in May to increase credit rates, and this is now in effect.

Me:  Don’t thank me – I haven’t raised the interest rates.  How do you expect people to continue with Chase when it is almost three times other rates?

Chase:  You are free to make whatever decisions you want concerning using the credit card.  I cannot make any adjustments to rates.

Me:  Do you realize that when I cancel this card, I am also closing out my other Chase accounts?

Chase:  You are certainly free to make whatever decisions you think are appropriate.

Me:  You no longer want me as a customer?  Let me ask you this:  Is there any reason you can think of for me to remain a Chase customer?

Chase:  unintelligible mumbling

Me:  You can’t think of a reason, can you?

Chase (female voice, obviously a recording):  If you feel you have been disconnected by accident, please call again …

Amazing.  I still can’t believe the twerp hung up on me.  I wonder how many of these calls they get a day?  I probably don’t have to tell you that I’m shutting down Chase tomorrow. But, I’m going down to the local branch to do it.  Someone there needs to know why customers are leaving like rats from a sinking ship.

I am, however, honestly perplexed.  In this delicate economic climate, and with Chase making money hand over fist, don’t you think they would be somewhat customer-focused?  Do they think people are so trapped that they don’t have any other options?  Perhaps some people are…  and that’s scary.

It’s also wrong … very wrong.   Chase will find out that stuff like this will come back to bite them.

The bigger they are…

The New Theme experiment

I’m trying out a new theme.  I’m not convinced that my old one (and I do mean old – it didn’t even use widgets!) was used up yet.

But, if you have an opinion, please let me know.

Here’s a course I’d like to take

From the Occidental College Course Catalog:

180. STUPIDITY.

Stupidity is neither ignorance nor organicity, but rather, a corollary of knowing and an element of normalcy, the double of intelligence rather than its opposite. It is an artifact of our nature as finite beings and one of the most powerful determinants of human destiny. Stupidity is always the name of the Other, and it is the sign of the feminine. This course in Critical Psychology follows the work of Friedrich Nietzsche, Gilles Deleuze, and most recently, Avital Ronell, in a philosophical examination of those operations and technologies that we conduct in order to render ourselves uncomprehending. Stupidity, which has been evicted from the philosophical premises and dumbed down by psychometric psychology, has returned in the postmodern discourse against Nation, Self, and Truth and makes itself felt in political life ranging from the presidency to Beevis and Butthead. This course examines stupidity.

Griffin
CORE REQUIREMENT MET: UNITED STATES

Regina Spektor, “Laugh With”

I just love this song; I heard it on the radio a day or 2 ago:

No one laughs at God in a hospital
No one laughs at God in a war
No one’s laughing at God when they’re starving or freezing or so very poor

No one laughs at God when the doctor calls after some routine tests
No one’s laughing at God when it’s gotten real late and their kid’s not back from that party yet

No one laughs at God when their airplane starts to uncontrollably shake
No one’s laughing at God when they see the one they love hand in hand with someone else and they hope that they’re mistaken
No one laughs at God when the cops knock on their door and they say “We’ve got some bad new, sir,”
No one’s laughing at God when there’s a famine, fire or flood

But God can be funny
At a cocktail party while listening to a good God-themed joke or
Or when the crazies say he hates us and they get so red in the head you think that they’re about to choke

God can be funny
When told he’ll give you money if you just pray the right way
And when presented like a genie
Who does magic like Houdini
Or grants wishes like Jiminy Cricket and Santa Claus

God can be so hilarious
Ha ha
Ha ha

No one laughs at God in a hospital
No one laughs at God in a war
No one’s laughing at God when they’ve lost all they got and they don’t know what for

No one laughs at God on the day they realize that the last sight they’ll ever see is a pair of hateful eyes
No one’s laughing at God when they’re saying their goodbyes

But God can be funny
At a cocktail party while listening to a good God-themed joke or
Or when the crazies say he hates us and they get so red in the head you think that they’re about to choke

God can be funny
When told he’ll give you money if you just pray the right way
And when presented like a genie
Who does magic like Houdini
Or grants wishes like Jiminy Cricket and Santa Claus

God can be so hilarious

No one laughs at God in a hospital
No one laughs at God in a war

No one laughs at God in a hospital
No one laughs at God in a war

No one’s laughing at God in a hospital
No one’s laughing at God in a war

No one’s laughing at God when they’re starving or freezing or so very poor

No one’s laughing at God
No one’s laughing at God
No one’s laughing at God
We’re all laughing with God

What’s the reading level of your blog or website?

I read an interesting post this morning about checking your reading level, to see if you are reaching your target audience.   Newspapers, for example, shoot for a 6th to 8th grade reading level. This, of course, is calculated by one of several simple formulas using sentence length, word length, and so on; it says nothing about whether or not any of the sentences make sense.  A local paper will often have a lower reading level than USA Today or the NY Times.  You get the idea.

Tammy Lenski (author of the above-mentioned post) pointed to a cool site, Juicy Studio, that will calculate the reading level of your site: http://juicystudio.com/services/readability.php.   It’s pretty cool, using three different formulas, and explaining how each works.   My blog is pretty consistent 8th-grade level.  The business blog I am setting up rates at an 11th or 12th-grade level, however.  This is probably a bit high for marketing purposes.

However, these tests only measure the structure of your writing, not the content.  For example, a post dealing with more complex philosophical and theological concepts rated lower than a post dealing with current events.  This is probably good, as it would make the concepts more accessible across the board. Either that, or I should start using more complex sentence structures to make myself sound more intelligent.

Try out the Juicy Studio site and let me know what you think.

The Cover Meme

Mike tagged me with the “Cover Meme,” in which we choose our vote for the best and worst covers of a song.  My song choice is Jimi Hendrix’s Little Wing.  The original is a classic- one of Hendrix’s best, in my opinion. It’s a slow, bluesy number with a very smooth, melodic guitar solo (by Hendrix standards).  The only complaint I would make is that the chorus repeats the verse’s melody line:

The worst cover of this that I have heard is by none other than Derek and the Dominoes (aka Eric Clapton and friends).  I really can’t figure out why they came up with this arrangement; they took a fairly perfect song and turned it into a plodding train-wreck.  The intro alone is enough to make you turn it off:

The best cover of this song is by Sting who, in my opinion, captured the true inner beauty of this song.  By reworking the chorus a bit, he avoided Hendrix’s repetitious melody line. And, the guitarist (Hiram Bullock) and sax player (Branford Marsalis) took the basic elements of Hendrix’s guitar solo and made it something amazing.  I think this is a rare occasion when the cover is an improvement over the original:

Interesting note: Eric Clapton appears on the CD “Nothing Like the Sun” where “Little Wing” appears. However, he did not play on this track.  I wonder why.

So, now my turn to tag… let’s see, how about Ken?

Yay! I made it!

Last night I took the plunge and moved this site over to Dreamhost, and upgraded WordPress at the same time. I’m sure I didn’t do it exactly right (for some reason I had to import the database twice), but everything’s apparently here.  I had a few moments of frustration and angst trying to figure out the directions and then do it differently, but with Elliot’s help and some sheer willpower, I completed it about 1 AM.

I still have to mess with some of the plugins and settings, as the backup I had that included the settings was incompatible for some reason.

If you see anything amiss, please let me know in a comment (I also moved my e-mail accounts, and haven’t quite worked all of the bugs out yet).